Rajendra Prasad Agrawal v. The Gaya Municipal Corporation And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12995 of 2013 ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad Agrawal S/o Late Arjun Lal Agrawal Resident of Mohalla- Chuna Gali, P.O.- H.P.O. P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya, through its Municipal Commissioner.
2. The Municipal Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya
3. The Revenue Officer, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya
4. The Adminstrator, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya
5. The Deputy Administrator, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 03-03-2016 Heard the parties.
Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi appears for the Gaya Municipal Corporation and submits that a re-measurement had already taken place but does not leave the petitioner satisfied. He further submits that although there is prayer to direct the respondents to issue a correct bill but again there is no objection by the petitioner to the assessment made by the Corporation. He further submits that in the nature of relief prayed, no indulgence can be granted to the petitioner.
A submission is being made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to deposit the tax. In my
Patna High Court CWJC No.12995 of 2013 (3) dt.03-03-2016 opinion, no leave is required for the petitioner to discharge the obligation of deposit of the holding tax timely. He is legally bound to do so.
No cause for indulgence is made out and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U