Ramesh Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3997 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Ramesh Kumar and Ors Son of Ramanand Kushwaha 2.
Ram Naresh Singh Son of late Rajendra Singh 3.
Satya Narain Singh@ Satya Narayan Prasad Son of Yogendra Singh 4.
Anand Kumar Son of late Arjun Singh 5.
Ram Babu Singh Son of late ram Avtar Singh 6.
Nagendra Rai Son of late Bindeshwar Rai 7.
Kishori Rai Son of late Lagan Rai 8.
Baiju Singh Son of late Bilash Singh 9.
Jai Kishore Singh Son of late Makhan Singh 10.
Devendra Singh Son of Munilal Singh 11.
Tulsi Kumar Verma Son of Devendra Singh All are Resident of VillageGothiya Ward No. 1, P.S. Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.
The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.
6.
The Public Complaint Redressal Officer, Sitamarhi. 7.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sitamarhi Sadar, Sitamarhi. 8.
The Sub-Divisional Public Complaint Redressal Officer, Sitamarhi Sadar, Sitamarhi.
9.
The Circle Officer, Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi. 10.
The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.
11.
The Officer-in-Charge, Bathnaha Police Station, District- Sitamarhi. 12.
Kailash Rai Son of late Chandeshwar Ri 13.
Nagendra Rai Son of late Dineshwar Rai Respondent No. 12 to 13 are resident of Village- Gothiya , Ward No. 1, P.S. Bathanah, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Hans Lal Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Ajay -GA5 ======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.3997 of 2018(3) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 28-06-2019 Learned counsel for the parties are present.
We have taken notice of the statement made by the respondent State in the counter affidavit filed more particularly in paragraph 12 wherein it is stated that encroachment complained of has been removed.
In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U