Shailendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38743 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2021 Thana- PASRAHA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Shailendra Yadav S/O Late Pulkit Yadav Resident of Village- Basua, P.S.- Pasraha, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Viveka Nandsingh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Fahimuddin,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 11-10-2022 In this case, a supplementary affidavit has been filed which is taken on record.

Heard Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, the learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks.

The case is registered under sections 449, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Pasraha P.S. Case No. 117 of 2021.

As per the FIR lodged by Rani Devi, it has been alleged by the informant that due to previous enmity, the accused persons including the petitioner herein dragged her out of the house and when the her son Bambam Kumar and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38743 of 2022(2) dt.11-10-2022 2/2 neighbours came to pacify the situation, it is alleged that the petitioner opened fire causing injury on left side of her chest. The further allegation against the other accused persons is/are of snatching Rs. 5500/- from the box as also gold chain from the daughter-in-law of the informant.

The petitioner who is having almost 23 criminal cases under his belt has been specifically alleged to have opened fire causing injury on the chest of the informant. Considering the allegation that has come in the FIR, this Court is not inclined to grant him any privilege and the bail application is accordingly rejected.

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/Ajay Singh U T