Ram Pravesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38063 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2023 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
RAM PRAVESH YADAV SON OF MANNU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PECHARI, PS- SHERGHATI, DISTRICT- GAYA 2.
BIRJESH YADAV @ BIRJESH KUMARR SON OF RAM PRAVESH YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PECHARI, PS- SHERGHATI, DISTRICT- GAYA 3.
BIJENDRA YADAV @ BIJENDRA KUMAR SON OF RAM PRAVESH YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PECHARI, PS- SHERGHATI, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land the accused persons came and Satendra assaulted her by lathi casuing injury on left hand, further, Ram Pravesh and Brijesh dashed her on the ground and torn her saree and blouse, it is next alleged that the accused persons also assaulted her family members and Bijendra snatched golden chain of her mother-in-law.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38063 of 2023(2) dt.01-08-2023 2/2
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land there was an altercation in which both sides assaulted each other, it is further submitted that allegation of tearing saree and blouse and snatching chain is ornamental in order to give a serious colour to the case, it is also submitted that the injuries suffered by the informant is simple in nature.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 88 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T