Sujeet Das @ Sujeet Kumar Das @ Sujeet Kr. Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36328 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sujeet Das @ Sujeet Kumar Das @ Sujeet Kr. Das Son of Virendra Das @ Birendra Das R/O Village - Muzaffarpur Malahi, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravish Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Earlier anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 18.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70036 of 2024 (Annexure- P1).

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 156 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons abused the informant and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36328 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 2/3 assaulted him with an intention to kill him, hit on his head with iron rod as a result of which he fell down with bleeding head injury.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no specific allegation of assault is attributed against the petitioner, rather the same has been attributed against co-accused, namely, Subodh Das. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that both the parties are agnate and there is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36328 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 156 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T