Bajrangi Singh v. Jai Prakash University And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8018 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Bajrangi Singh S/o- Late Yadunath Singh, Resident of- New Colony, Gandhi Chowk, Chapra (Saran).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Jai Prakash University, Rahul Sankrityayan Nagar Chapra, (Bihar) through the Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

2. The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

3. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

4. University Engineer, Jai Prakash University Chapra.

5. The Finance Officer, Jai Prakash University, Chapra. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewary, Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the University : Mr. Nagendra Prasad Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for Jai Prakash University.

In the present case, petitioner is claiming for payment of Rs.22,96,487/-.

Petitioner has been allotted work for the construction of the Social Science Language and Humanities Block at New campus of Jai Prakash University, Chapra after being selected in the tender. As per petitioner, he has already constructed certain part of the work and he has requested for revision of the rate which was never revisited and of their own they have awarded

Patna High Court CWJC No.8018 of 2017 dt.11-08-2017 the work to another contractor and got construction work completed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has received payment of Rs.1,17,68,489/- and claimed that he worked for Rs.1,40,64,976/- and as such he is entitled for rest amount of Rs.22,96,487/-.

In such view of the matter, petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the Vice Chancellor, Jail Prakash University, Chapra who will be obliged to examine the same and if he finds that petitioner is entitled for the same it goes without saying that the same should be paid to him but if the Vice Chancellor arrives to a different findings, in such circumstances, he will be obliged to give notice to the petitioner and after hearing he will pass a reasoned order within three months from the date of filing of the said representation.

With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of.

Vinay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 18.8.2017 Transmission Date NA