← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40791/2024disposed

Md Manjoor @ Md Manjoor Alam @ Manjoor Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-26Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40791 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2023 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Md Manjoor @ Md Manjoor Alam @ Manjoor Khan Son of Md. Israel Resident of Village- Bengaipatti, Hulas, Ward No.- 5, P.S- Raghopur, DistSupaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the state.

2. The instance application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Sessions Trial No. 194/2023 arising out of Raghopur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2023 instituted for the offence u/s 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the application for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 1.11.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59180 of 2023 with a direction to expedite and conclude the trial.

4. In pursuance to the direction of this Court, a report dt. 26.6.2024 with regard to the present stage of trial has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40791 of 2024(3) dt.26-07-2024 2/2 received by which it appears that out of eleven witnesses, only five have been examined as yet and six months time will be required to conclude the trial.

5. No fresh ground is made for reconsideration of the regular bail application of the petitioner, as such, his prayer is rejected.

6. Accordingly, this application stands disposed off.

7. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of six months, failing which the petitioner may renew his prayer of bail. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T