Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2120 of 2019 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.836 of 2019 ====================================================== Anand Kumar S/o Ram Yash Ram Resident of Road No. 1A, White House Compound, Near Mirza Ghalib College, P.O-Gaya, P.S-Rampur, DistrictGaya, At present Residing in the House of Umesh Prasad Yadav, MohallaBhagat Singh Colony, Nand Lal Mishra Lane, Surkhikal, P.S-Barari, DistrictBhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director General of Police Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Inspector General of Police Central Zone, Patna. 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police Magadh Range, Gaya. 5.

The Senior Superintendent of Police Gaya.

6.

The Dy. S.P. (Town) Gaya.

7.

The Officer-in-charge (S.H.O.) SC/ST Police Station, Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma (AAG3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-01-2020 This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking restoration of Cr.W.J.C. No. 836 of 2019 which stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 13.05.2019. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that on 13.05.2019, when the case was called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner was busy in arguing another case before another Bench of this Court. In that view of the matter, he could not track the Court proceeding, as a result of which, the

Patna High Court MJC No.2120 of 2019(3) dt.22-01-2020 2/2 case stood dismissed for want of prosecution. It is further contended that the default on the part of the counsel or the petitioner was neither intentional nor deliberate. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose the prayer for restoration of the application.

Regard being had to the submissions advanced at the bar, the miscellaneous jurisdiction application is allowed, the Cr.W.J.C. No. 836 of 2019 is restored to its original file. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) rohit/- U