Dhananjay Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48101 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2017 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== DHANANJAY DAS S/o Late Chalitar Ravidas Resident of Village- Jay Bigha, P.S.- Gurua, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Rina Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prayer of petitioner for bail was earlier rejected by this court vide order dated 21.09.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24164/2020.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that charge has already framed and the case is running for evidence of prosecution witnesses. Petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2018.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts of the case, the period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48101 of 2021(2) dt.01-09-2021 2/2 custody of the petitioner and progress of the trial, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Gurua PS case No. 22/2017 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/ her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T