Mundrika Prasad Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14212 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2016 Thana -MUFFASIL District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Mundrika Prasad Chaudhary Son of Late Panchu Choudhary Resident of Dharamshala Road, P.O. P.S. Town and District - Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Agarwal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Rab (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 26-05-2016 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Agarwal, for the petitioner and Mr. M. Rab, APP for the State.
Today I have granted bail to the petitioner of Criminal Misc. No. 14130 of 2016 and 14157 of 2016.
It is stated that the present case is also similar in nature. The case has been lodged by the Circle Officer alleging that on inspection of the business premises shortage of coal was found. For the reasons stated in the order dated 26.05.2016, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14130 of 2016 and 14157 of 2016 as also the fact that in same other similar case, relief has been granted to the petitioner(s), I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
Let the petitioner above named, in the event of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14212 of 2016 (3) dt.26-05-2016 2/2 arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Aurangabad Mufassil P.S. Case No. 42/2016 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2), the code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member. The petitioner shall appear on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bonds.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) rohit/- U T