Mina Kumari. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3398 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1839 of 2012 ====================================================== Mina Kumari, W/o Gore Lal Saw, R/o Village and Post Dabil, P.S. Khaira, Dist. Jamui.

.... .... Respondent No.9-Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Distrcit Education Officer, Jamui namely Sri Bashisth Narayan Singh.

2. The Distrcit Education Officer, Jamui named Sri Bashisth Narayan Singh.

3. The District Tacher Employment (Nizoan) Appellate Tribunal, Jamui through its Member namely Sri Upendra Narayan Singh.

4. The Member, Distrcit Teacher Niozen Appellate Tribunal, Jamui namely Sri Upendra Narayan Singh.

5. Block Development Officer, Jhajha namely Sri Dindayal Prasad.

6. In-charge Headmaster, Upgraded Middle School, Khuri Paras, Jhajha, Jamui namely Sri Niranjan Paswan.

7. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Jamukharaiya, P.S. Jhajha, Dist. Jamui namely, Smt. Naiha Devi.

8. Panchayat Secretary (Empoloyment Officer), Gram Panchayat Panchayat Raj, Jamui Kharaiya, P.S. Jhajha, Dist. Jamui, namely, Sri Suresh Singh.

9. Satdeo Mandal, son of Nuneshwar Mandal, R/o Rani Kura, P.S. Jhajha, Dist. Jamui.

10. Seema Kumari Singh, W/o Pankaj Kumar Singh, Resident of Village Irjawara, P.S. Gidhaur, Dist. Jamui.

--- Respondents/Opp. Party 1st Set

11. Subhadra Kumari, D/o Saryu Mandal, resident of Village Dhapri, P.S. Jhajha, Dist. Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/Opp. Party 2nd Set ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anis Akhtar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2015 While no one appears for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite parties, having filed show-cause reply, have taken a stand that the direction given by this Court in the connected writ application has already been complied. In support

Patna High Court MJC No.3398 of 2014 (2) dt.08-09-2015 of the same, Mr. Anis Akhtar, learned counsel for the State has also referred to Annexure A & B to show compliance of the direction given by this Court.

This Court, on perusal of the show-cause reply, is satisfied that the direction given in the connected writ application stands complied.

That being so, this application has become infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U