Nanhe Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35278 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Nanhe Khan, Son of Md. Naim Khan, R/o village - Karimchak Korar, P.S.- Chapra Town @ Town, District- Saran.

2.

Dhanesh Kumar Singh Son of Late Bhanu Singh R/o village - Enai @ Inai, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran.

3.

Hari Prasad @ Hari Prakash Son of Marahi Prasad @ Marai Prasad @ Madhai Prasad R/o village - Dahiyava Mission Road @ Dahiawa Mission Road, P.S.- Chapra Town @ Town, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 226 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 30 (a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. 161 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from the Vikram Tempo. Allegation against the petitioners are that they tried to fled away from the seized tempo.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35278 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 case on the basis of suspicion only. Petitioners were returning from their relative house and they have no concern with the materials found in the Vikram tempo nor they have any concern with the seized liquor. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent in which they are on bail. Charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioners and they undertake to cooperate in the trial. Petitioners are in custody since 30.04.2025.

5.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions on behalf of the parties, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 226 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T