Patna High CourtMJC/1571/2017disposed

Sanoj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna And ORS

2018-02-06Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.1571 of 2017 (4) dt.06-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1571 of 2017 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1230 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Sanoj Kumar Yadav, Son of Late Yugeshwar Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village Ora Bagicha, P.S. Dharahara District Munger, At present Residing at Mohalla court Area, Town Lakhisarai, P.S. Kabaiya, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Son of not known, the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Navin Chandra Jha, Son of not known, the Commissioner, Munger Division, Government of Bihar, Munger.

4. Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Son of not Known, the District Magistrate Cum Collector, Lakhisarai.

5. Sri Ramesh Prasad, Son of not known, the District Development Commissioner, Lakhisarai.

6. Sri Mukesh Kumar, Son of not known, the Additional District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

7. Sri Kishori Choudhary, Son of not known, the Additional District Magistrate, Establishment, Lakhisarai, Collectoriat, Lakhisarai.

8. Smt. Shailaja Sharma, daughter of not known the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

9. Sri Rajesh Kumar, Son of not known the District Nazarath Officer, Lakhisarai.

10. Sri Manjul Manohar Madhukar, Son of not known, the Block Development, Lakhisarai.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siaram Sahi Mr. Om Prakash Maharaj For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma- AAG-3 Mr. S.K. Sharma, A.C. to A.A.G.-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2018 Learned counsel for the State files a supplementary show-cause, paragraph No. 4 of which indicates that the order under contempt has now been complied with and, therefore, the application has become infructuous.

Patna High Court MJC No.1571 of 2017 (4) dt.06-02-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the application has now become infructuous in view of the compliance of the order.

It is thus dismissed as infructuous.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U