← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9436/2017disposed

Muslim Mian @ Muslim Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-01The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9436 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Muslim Mian @ Muslim Ansari, Son of Khalil Mian, resident of Village- Pakri Narottam, P.O.- Satjora, P.S. Panapur, District- Saran.

2. Lawlin Singh, Son of Shyam Narayan Singh.

3. Rajendra Pandey, Son of Late Ramanand Pandey.

4. Dasrath Singh, Son of Mohan Singh. All 2,3 and 4 are Residents of VillagePakri Narottam, Post- Satjora, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran.

5. Jhanendra Ray Son of Ram Janam Ray, resident of Village- Mathaura, P.O.- Dubauli, P.S.- Panapur, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sugapati Devi, the Ex Mukhiya of Totaha Jagatpur Panchayat, P.O. Satjora, P.S. Panapur, District- Saran.

3. The Secretary, Totaha Jagatpur Panchayat P.O. Satjora, P.S. Panapur, DistrictSaran.

4. The Block Development Officer, Panapur, Saran.

5. The District Magistrate, Saran.

6. The Commissioner, Saran.

7. The Branch Manager, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Saran. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi-AAG-6 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 01-08-2017 Keeping in view the grievance made by the petitioner, for the present, without entering into the controversy on merit and without expressing any opinion on the allegations made by the petitioner, respondent No.5, District Magistrate, Saran, is directed to look into the complaint and take steps as permissible under law and

Patna High Court CWJC No.9436 of 2017 dt.01-08-2017 2/2 thereafter, if the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting, he shall have liberty to file private complaint against the respondents under Section 200 Cr.P.C.

With the aforesaid observation and direction to the District Magistrate, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 5.8.2017 Transmission Date N/A