Sanjeev Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12605 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Sanjeev Kumar Son of Late Umesh Prasad 2.

Dhruv Narayan Prasad 3.

Janardan Prasad Both Sons of Late Ram Prasad Mahto 4.

Sanjay Kumar Son of Late Raj Kishore Prasad All residents of Village Chakanwada, P.O. , P.S. Aungari, District Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif. 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda, Biharsharif. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Development Department, Hilsa, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

6.

The Circle Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda, Biharsharif. 7.

The Director Construction Company.

8.

Salendra Engi Com. Pvt. Kumuddinganj, Biharsharif at Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP - 14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 16-02-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 19-01-2013 passed in L.A.R. Case No.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12605 of 2018(4) dt.16-02-2026 2/3 38 of 2010 by learned Additional Judge IInd cum special Judge (Land Acquisition) Saran, Chapra as contained in Annexure-4 to petition, whereby and where under learned additional Judge IInd cum Special Judge (Land Acquisition) Saran Chapra was pleased to award Rs.9900/- per decimal with 121 interest and the relief of the petitioner are as follows-:

(i) pay the enhanced compensation at the rate of Rs.60000/- per decimal as per government rate;

(ii) pay the genuine cost of the house boring, tree, and well etc.;

(iii) give a job to the family member of the petitioner in the Indian Railway;

(iv) provide other consequential benefits to the petitioner;

(v) other awards for which the petitioner is liable.

3. Learned State counsel Mr. Prasad has taken to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.5, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12605 of 2018(4) dt.16-02-2026 3/3 Executive Engineer, Rural Development Department, Hilsa, Nalanda, Biharsharif with reference to paragraph 06, according to which both the sides gave 5 fit each land with their consent, the PCC road was constructed by the State through the Panchayat of that area in the year 2016.

4. The submission is that for long, the kaccha road was being used on which the PCC road was constructed. The petitioner maintains silence and did not raise any objection.

5. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U