Anil Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47646 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Anil Ram S/O Sudhir Prasad R/O Gol Bhatta Barahiya, P.S-Barahiya, District-Lakhisarai.

2.

Sudhir Ram @ Sudhir Prasad S/O Late Parshuram Prasad R/O Gol Bhatta Barahiya, P.S-Barahiya, District-Lakhisarai.

3.

Mulki Devi W/O Sudhir Prasad R/O Gol Bhatta Barahiya, P.S-Barahiya, District-Lakhisarai.

4.

Manisha Kumari D/O Sudhir Prasad R/O Gol Bhatta Barahiya, P.SBarahiya, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mayank Bilochan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498(A), 341, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioner no. 1 is brother-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is father-in-law, petitioner no.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47646 of 2021(2) dt.22-10-2021 2/2 3 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 4 is sister-in-law, of the victim. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Lakhisarai in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 19/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T