Vicky Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47509 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2021 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== VICKY YADAV Son of Dayanand Bharti Resident of Village- Supaul, Ward No.26, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Patla Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case no. 49 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per allegation in the FIR, when the informant at his house, all of a sudden 20-25 miscreants including the petitioner entered into his house and petitioner make firing by his pistol to make the family members afraid from them. They started looting the ornaments. When the informant opposed them, petitioner hit on his head by butt of the gun resulting into swelling over his head.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47509 of 2021(2) dt.24-03-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. There is case and counter case. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. No one has received fire arm injury. After prevailing good sense, the matter has been compromised, Annexure-2 is compromise petition. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Supaul P.S. Case no. 49 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U