Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36338 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2019 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== SANJAY YADAV @ SANJAY KUMAR YADAV Son of Rudal Yadav Resident of Village- Majuraha, P.S.- Turkauliya (Raghunathpur O.P.), DistrictEast Champaran. At Present resident of Village- Bhopatpur, P.S.- Kotwa (Bhopatpur O.P.), District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Kotwa (Bhopatpur O.P.) P.s. Case 54 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 506, 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity and political rivalry merely because he is husband of the present Mukhiya of the Panchayat.
Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36338 of 2019(3) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 allegation of assault and demand of ransom against this petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is also accused in several other cases. He, therefore, submits that the petitioner does not deserve to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T