Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5241 of 2017 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, Son of Shri Shiv Dayal Roy, Resident of Village- Mahua Ram Ray, Police Station- Mahua, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development & Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001.
4. The North Bihar Regional Transport Authority, Muzaffarpur through its Secretary-cum-Deputy Transport Commissioner, Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
5. The Divisional Commissioner-Cum- Chairman, North Bihar Regional Transport Authority, Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
6. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
7. The Additional Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.
8. The District Transport Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.
9. The Senior Deputy Collector, In- Charge, General Section, Vaishali at Hajipur.
10. The Sub Divisional Officer, Mahua, District- Vaishali.
11. The Circle Officer, Mahua, District- Vaishali.
12. The Nagar Panchayat, Mahua, through its Executive Officer, Mahua, District- Vaishali.
13. The Chairman, Nagar Panchayat, Mahua, District- Vaishali.
14. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Mahua, District- Vaishali.
15. Dipakesh Ranjan, Son of not known to the petitioner, Contractor for the Mahua Bus Stand Established by the Mahua Nagar Panchayat, Mahua, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navendu Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kr. Singh- G.P.26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the orders dated 19.05.2017 and 26.05.2017 the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, so he does not want to press this application.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5241 of 2017 (4) dt.29-06-2017 2/2 In such view of the matter, this writ application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U