Fanindra Kumar Verma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8982 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Fanindra Kumar Verma Son of Late Shripati Prasad Verma, Resident of Village-Bankatwa, Babuitola, P.O.-Bagha, P.S.-Bagha, District-West Champaran.

2. Raj Kumar Prasad Son of Late Kala Brij Nandan Prasad Sinha, Resident of Mohalla-Prithvipur 1st Street Chiraiyatand, Patna, P.O. + G.P.O. + P.S.-Kankarbagh, District-Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, General and Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat Patna

4. The Secretary Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

5. The Joint Agriculture Director cum Controller Measurement and Weightage, Raja Bazar, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Director Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

7. The Deputy Director (Administration) Agriculture Directorate Bihar, Patna.

8. Assistant Controller, Measurement and Weightage, Rohtas, Sasaram. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III For the Respondent/s : Mr. Awanish Nandan Sinha, GP-21 Mr. Jay Prakash Sharma, AC to GP-21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-04-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if they are permitted to file a representation before the respondent no. 4 regarding their grievances mentioned in the writ petition and the respondent no. 4 be directed to dispose of the said representation within a specified time frame.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8982 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2018 2/2 Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners may file a representation regarding their grievances within two weeks and in case such representation is filed before the respondent no. 4, then the same may be considered and disposed of within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of the said representation by a speaking and reasoned order considering the fact that similarly situated employees have been granted the benefit of third A.C.P., who are even juniors to the petitioners.

The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U