Patna High CourtCWJC/8625/2017disposed

Abdul Gani v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-09-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8625 of 2017 =========================================================== Abdul Gani son of Late Nek Mohammad Sayeed, Resident of Village- Mansatola, Police Station- Muffasil (Bettiah), District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), West Champaran, Bettiah

6. The District Programme Officer (MDM), West Champaran, Bettiah

7. The Block Education Officer, Block Manjhaulia, District West Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. JITENDRA KR.ROY NO1-SC13 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-09-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition for quashing the order dated 13.05.2017, as contained in Memo No. 1399 (Annexure5). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was suspended on 13.05.2017, but till date charge has not been framed against him. The petitioner is going to retire on 31.10.2017. He was suspended only on the allegation that he remained absent for two days and did not submit the records.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the concerned authority is

Patna High Court CWJC No.8625 of 2017 dt.05-09-2017 2/2 directed to frame charge against the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of this order and thereafter, conclude the departmental proceeding expeditiously preferably within three months thereafter, since the petitioner is going to retire. With this observation, this writ petition is disposed of. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Vinita/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 11/09/2017 Transmission Date NA