Md. Masud v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35988 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2023 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
Md. Masud S/o Md. Masnun R/o vill - Pranpur, ward no. 13, P.S.- Bakhari, Distt.- Begusarai 2.
Md. Irfan S/o Md. Islam R/o vill - Pranpur, ward no. 13, P.S.- Bakhari, Distt.- Begusarai 3.
Md. Faijul S/o Md. Wakil R/o vill - Pranpur, ward no. 13, P.S.- Bakhari, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 05-06-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners in this application pray for bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case no.143 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the six named accused persons including the three petitioners herein came variously armed. On the orders of Md. Wakil and Md. Ekamul, it is stated that Md. Faizul struck the informant with a farsa on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35988 of 2025(2) dt.05-06-2025 2/3 his head while Md. Mashun struck him with a lathi. It is further stated that on one Md. Mujassir coming to the informant's rescue, Md. Gulfan attacked him with a sharp edge weapon. On his falling down, Md. Irfan assaulted with a lathi on his nose.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. There is case and counter case between the parties and the land dispute including Title Suit no.44 of 2024 is pending in the Court of Sub Judge, Bakhari. Referring to the injury report, it is submitted that the same does not support the prosecution case and in any case, the injuries have been found to be simple in nature.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the FIR together with the contents of the injury report and the pending disputes between the parties, it is directed that all the three petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case no.143 of 2023 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35988 of 2025(2) dt.05-06-2025 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge XI, Begusarai. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T