Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38186 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2021 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== RAJESH KUMAR Son of Ramshewak Yadav Resident of Village - Lemboiya, P.S.- Roshanganj, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and on account of dispute relating to land, the present occurrence took place, in which the informant alleges that while her son was going to look for his cattle after taking meal when he was intercepted by Ramshevak and this petitioner who started abusing and assaulting him, it is next alleged that petitioner assaulted him with kudal and danda on account of which he sustained injuries on head.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38186 of 2022(2) dt.20-10-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from the FIR itself, it is evident that on account of land dispute the present occurrence took place, it is next submitted that the petitioner is a young boy of 20 years of age and is a person with clean antecedent and on account of land dispute, it is alleged that the present occurrence took place and even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered is simple no doubt it is on vital part of the body, it is also submitted that, in the event, if the petitioner is sent to jail his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are very probable that he will come in company of hardened criminals.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38186 of 2022(2) dt.20-10-2022 3/3 is pending/successor court in connection with Roshanganj P.S. Case No. 104 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his mother 'Lila Devi'.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T