Sarfaraz Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37022 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Sarfaraz Alam Son of Mujibur Rahman Resident of Village - Motihara Islampur, Police Station and District - Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anish Chandra, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025 lodged on 24.02.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Kishanganj.
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against two named accused persons including the present petitioner. It has been alleged in the FIR that one desi katta with two live cartridges have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37022 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 case and false and concocted allegation has been made against him. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.02.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is a specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR as one desi katta with two live cartridges have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T