Nandjee Mehta v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Namely Vivek Kumar Singh, Department Of Revenue

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1768 of 2017 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6474 of 2014 =========================================================== Nandjee Mehta, Son Of Late Ram Naresh Singh, Resident Of Village + P.O. Kastar Mahadeo, Police Station Bikramganj, District Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary namely Vivek Kumar Singh, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, namely Anand Kishore, Patna Division, Patna.

3. The Collector Cum District Magistrate namely B.P. Yadav, District Bhojpur at Ara.

4. The Additional collector Land Reform namely Surendra Prasad, District Bhojpur at Ara.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer namely Navdeep Shukla, Sadar, Ara, District Bhojpur.

6. The Circle Officer namely Wakil Prasad Singh Udwant Nagar, District Bhojpur.

7. The Accountant General (P & E) namely Krishna Pandey, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam - AAG 12 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-01-2018 Respondents have filed a show cause. Office to place the same on record.

A copy of the show cause goes to show that in pursuance of the order passed, the matter has been re-considered and certain benefits have been granted to the petitioner such as pension, gratuity etc. have been allowed and vide order filed on record. Various amounts have been paid to the petitioner i.e. subsistence allowance of

Patna High Court MJC No.1768 of 2017 dt.24-01-2018 2/2 Rs.3,360, pension and arrears have also been paid, as is evident from para 9 of the show cause and now, in view of the above, no further indulgence into the matter is called for.

In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to settlement of his claim, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law in a fresh proceeding. With the aforesaid liberty, the application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 25-01-2018 Transmission Date