Dinanath Raut And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 20863 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2016 Thana -MOHAMMADPUR District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Dinanath Raut Son of Singashan Raut

2. Tun Tun Raut Son of Ramlal Raut

3. Baharan Raut son of Kari Raut

4. Badai Raut son of Suman Raut

5. Pakadi Raut Son of Janardan Raut

6. Prayag Raut Son of Singashan Raut

7. Kishun Raut son of Rangi Raut

8. Om Prakash Raut Son of Lakshman Raut

9. Bhikham Raut Son of Kamal Raut

10. Sukhari Raut Son of Kamal Raut

11. Ashok Raut Son of Basmin Raut

12. Shri Bhagwan Raut Son of Chhathu Raut

13. Achhelal Raut son of Chhothu Raut

14. Baijnath Raut Son of Sheo Mangal Raut

15. Sanjay Raut Son of Sheo Mangal Raut

16. Dinesh Mahto Son of Kripal Mahto

17. Shyam Lal Gupta @ Shyam lal Sah Son of Ramnath Gupta

18. Shriram Raut Son of Lakshman Raut

19. Motilal Raut son of Chhothu Raut All ( i.e no. 1 to 19 ) are resident of Village- Kushahar, P.S.- Mohammadpur, District- Gopalganj.

20. Nagendra Raut son of Chhabila Raut

21. Kisun Raut Son of Rangi Raut

22. Madho Raut Son of Rangi Raut

23. Sunil Raut Son of Bansi Raut

24. Tiayai Raut Son of Chhabila Raut

25. Suresh Bansfore @ Suresh Raut Son of Banka Bansfore @ Banka Raut

26. Prabhu Raut Son Ramdhari Raut

27. Shambhoo Raut son of Banshi Raut

28. Baharan Raut son of Kari Raut

29. Yugul Sah Son of Chandrika Sah

30. Mukhtar Das Son of Badari Das

31. Baharan Sah Son of Rangila Sah

2/4

32. Shri Bhagwan Sah Son of Gati Sah

33. Sudeshwar Raut Son of Tuker Raut (All i.e. serial no. 20 to 33) are resident of Village- Pakari, P.S. Mohammadpur, District Gopalganj).

34. Suresh Ram Son of Chadeo Ram

35. Chandeo Ram Son of Bilar Ram

36. Ramdeo Raut Son of Bilar Raut

37. Rajendra Raut Son of Dashrath Raut

38. Prabhu Ram Son of Raj Kumar Ram

39. Birendra Mahato Son of Ram Kripal Mahato

40. Raj Ballabh Ram Son of Anarat Ram All (i.e. Sl no. 34 to 40) are resident of Village- Jhanjhawa Bazar, P.S. Mohammadpur, District Gopalganj).

41. Mahangu Mahato Son of Shankar Mahto Resident of VillageBisunpura, P.S.- Sidhwaliya, District- Gopalganj.

42. Ramdayal Ram Son of Chanar Ram

43. Adalat Ram Son of Sabal Ram Both i.e. no. 42 and 43 are resident of Village- Balichhapar, P.S. Sidhwaliya, District- Gopalganj.

44. Harilal Ram Son of Sheoram

45. Shankar Ram Son of Indrashan Ram Both (i.e. sl no. 44 and 45) are resident of Village- Sahpur, P.S. Sidhwaliya, District- Gopalganj.

46. Lallan Ram Son of Bikram Ram

47. Ganesh Mahto Son of Parshuram Mahato

48. Saheb Manjhi Son of Sugeshwar Manjhi

49. Shambhoo Ram Son of Raj Kumar Ram All (i.e. Sl no. 46 to 49) are resident of Village- Madhopur, P.S. Sidhwaliya, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kr. Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

3/4 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 386, 120(B) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have forcefully taken possession of the land of the referred sugar mill of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that civil remedy is there and in fact the said land was granted by the competent authority in favour of the petitioners through valid parcha issued by the government. No criminal liability is made out.

Considering the nature of allegation, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj/successor Court in connection with Mohammadpur Police Station Case No. 92 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall

4/4 fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T