Kusum Sadhvi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36617 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2017 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
KUSUM SADHVI W/O Late Mangal Yadav 2.
Dangal Yadav Son of Late Bouku Yadav 3.
Pappu Yadav Son of Late Nago Yadav All Residents of Village - Bhatgama, P.S.- Chousa, Dist.- Madhepura. 4.
Abhinandan Yadav @ Abhinandan Kumar Son of Lalo Yadav Resident of Village - Dhovinlaya, P.S.- Naugachhiya, Dist.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bibhuti Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2019 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chausa P. S. Case No. 104 of 2017 registered under Sections 323, 325,341,379,406,504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that brother of the informant namely Sandeep Burman had become a saint and used to live with petitioner no. 1, Kusum Sadhvi, in Kuppaghat, Bhagalpur. It is alleged that in the marriage of daughter of petitioner no. 1, brother of informant had given a sum of Rs. One lac to petitioner no. 1 which was being demanded by the informant as well as his brother and when informant went to the house of petitioner no. 1, she along with other accused persons assaulted the informant and his brother with lathi, danda etc. causing injuries to them.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36617 of 2019(3) dt.17-08-2019 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in a concocted story and allegation of giving a sum of Rs. One lac to the petitioner no. 1 is also false and baseless and injury caused to the informant is simple in nature.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that police after investigation did not find any proof regarding handing over money amounting to Rs. One lacs to the petitioner no. 1 by the brother of the informant and further injury caused to the informant is simple in nature, as such I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Udakishunganj in connection with Chousa P.S.Case No. 104 of 2017; subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T