← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2125/2019allowed

Md. Hasan Raza v. The Bihar State Madrasa Education Board

2025-07-04Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2125 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21838 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Hasan Raza Son of Abdul Mannan Resident of Village- Khaza Nagar, Puraini, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. 2.

Md. Rashid Hussain Son of Md. Sayeed Ahmad Resident of VillageHasaya, P.S.- Dhoraiya, District- Banka. 3.

Md. Abdul Jabbar Ahmad Son of Zaheer Ahmad Resident of Village- Khaja Nagar, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. 4.

Nadir Tabdar Son of Khurshid Alam Resident of Mohalla- Khalilpura Road, Near F.C.I. Godown, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar State Madrasa Education Board Patna through its Secretary, Vidyapati Marg P.S. Kotwali District- Patna.

2.

The Chairman Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna, Vidyapati Marg P.S. Kotwali District- Patna.

3.

The Secretary Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna, Vidyapati Marg P.S. Kotwali District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md. Abu Shajar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shri Prakash Srivastava, Adv.

For the Board :

Md. Aslam Ansari, Adv.

Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 21838 of 2018, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution, vide order dated 29.4.2019.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that since the counsel for the petitioners had gone out of station, he could not appear when the case was called out for hearing,

Patna High Court MJC No.2125 of 2019(4) dt.04-07-2025 2/2 hence, the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file. 3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.21838 of 2018 to its original file.

4.

The present petition stands allowed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U