Dhiraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Mirdha @ Dhiraj Kumar Mirdha @ Dhiraj Kr v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35658 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2025 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== Dhiraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Mirdha @ Dhiraj Kumar Mirdha @ Dhiraj Kr son of Dilip Mirdha @ Dilip Kumar Mirdha Resident Of Village- Bhurbhuri, PsBounsi, Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 12-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bounsi P.S Case no.6 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 304(2), 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that while he was returning after having sold his cattle, four accused persons on two motorcycles stopped him and looted him of Rs.75,000/- in cash which he was carrying as also Rs. 10,000/- from Kailash Yadav.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown accused persons. Referring to the order of the learned trial Court, it is submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35658 of 2025(2) dt.12-06-2025 2/3 material that has transpired in course of investigation has been dealt with in the order of the learned trial Court rejecting the application for bail of the petitioner. It is submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession and inspite of being in custody since 8.2.2025, he has not been put on T.I parade. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case. In reference to paragraph no.37 of the case diary, it is submitted that the prosecution is mainly relying on the location of the petitioner's mobile phone as per the CDR to be in the vicinity of the area where the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the submissions made, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent and chargesheet having been submitted in the case without putting the petitioner on T.I parade inspite of his being in custody since 8.2.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Bounsi P.S Case no.6 of 2025 on furnishing bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35658 of 2025(2) dt.12-06-2025 3/3 bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T