Kunti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38916 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2022 Thana- FESHAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== KUNTI KUMARI Daughter of Yugeshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Sanath Bigha, P.s.- Dalmiyanagar, P.S. - Dehri, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The vigilance Investigation Bureau through Police Inspector- CumInvestigation officer, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Gaya Range, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP For the Vigilance :

Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

Petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of IPC. The allegation against the petitioner is that she got appointment as a Panchayat Teacher in the year, 2013 on the basis of forged certificates.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner, at the time of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38916 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 selection presented all her certificates before the Selection Committee and after finding it correct, the petitioner was selected by the Committee. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been dismissed from the service, which is also clear from Annexure-2 to this application. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the Vigilance opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since petitioner has been dismissed, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Fesar P.S. Case No.15 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T