← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1349/2018disposed

Nityanand Prasad Rana And ANR v. Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary And ORS

2019-09-18Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1349 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5268 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Nityanand Prasad Rana Son of Sri Jagdish Pandit Resident of Baidhi Sadan, Sharma Chowk, Post Office- Simari Bhakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. 2.

Kumari Bindhvasini D/o Sri Jagdish Pandit Resident of Baidhi Sadan, Sharma Chowk, Post Office- Simari Bhakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Ram Chandra Tudu, Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. Om Prakash, The District Education Officer, Saharsa. 4.

Mr. Rahul Chandra Chaudhary, at present District Programme Officer, (Establishment), District- Saharsa.

5.

Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Block Education Officer, Banma Itahari, District- Saharsa.

6.

Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, Then Block Education Officer, Banma Itahari, District- Saharsa.

7.

Smt. Mamta Kumari Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Itahari, Block Banma Itahri, District- Saharsa.

8.

Mr. Subodh Paswan, The Present Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Itahri, Block- Banma Itahri, District- Saharsa. 9.

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, The then Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Banma Itahri, Block- Banma Itahri, District- Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Rajpati For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 18-09-2019 Considering the detailed report of the Additional Director General Vigilance dated 09.09.2019, the Court is convinced that there is no attempt by the opposite parties to defeat the direction issued by this Court warranting the

Patna High Court MJC No.1349 of 2018(14) dt.18-09-2019 2/2 interference in the matter.

The present application for initiating contempt is accordingly, dismissed.

The report submitted to this Court on behalf of Vigilance is handed over to the counsel appearing on behalf of Vigilance in sealed cover.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U