Nagendra Yadav @ Nagendra Singh @ Nagendra Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40599 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2023 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Nagendra Yadav @ Nagendra Singh @ Nagendra Kumar Yadav S/o Late Hirdaya Yadav @ Hirdaya Dayal Singh @ Hirdayananad Singh Resident of Village- Phingi, P.S.- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihiya P.S. Case No. 336 of 2023 registered for the offences under Section 307/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 17.02.2025.
4. As per FIR, petitioner along with other co-accused persons caused gun shot injury upon informant during the course of occurrence.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated due to certain monetary disputes, where allegation of gun shot also appears available against co-accused person. It is pointed out that injury as alleged to be caused by this petitioner appears on the non-vital part of the body. Arguing further, it is submitted that despite
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40599 of 2025(4) dt.24-11-2025 2/2 custody of petitioner for about 9 months not even single prosecution witness was examined and, therefore, trial of this case is not likely to conclude in the near future. While concluding the argument it is submitted that, petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case has already completed, and as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
6. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for bail.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of nature of overall accusations, where trial of this case is not likely to conclude in the near future, coupled with the fact as petitioner remains in custody since 17.02.2025, accordingly above named petitioner, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bihiya P.S. Case No. 336 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bhojpur at Ara/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) S.Tripathi/- U T