← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1203/2018disposed

Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-12-12The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1203 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.968 of 2015 ====================================================== Anil Kumar S/o Late Rajnath Ram R/o Village Muria, P.S. Pali, District Patna, presently deputed with the Minister of the Building Construction Department as Driver.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Mr. Chanchal Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, 3.

Mr. Ajit Ram, the Under Secretary to the Government, Building Construction Department, Government o 4.

Mr. Upendra Narayan, The Incharge Chief Engineer South, Building Construction Department, Governme 5.

Mr. Amrit Ram, the Superintending Engineer, South Bihar Circle, Building Construction Department, G 6.

Mr. Ram Babu Prasad, the Executive Engineer, Construction Sanrachna Division - 2, Building Constru 7.

Mr. Ravindra Nath Prasad, the Executive Engineer, Central Building Division, Building Construction ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bishnu Kant Dubey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amit Prakash - Ga 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-12-2019 This application has been preferred praying inter alia for the following relief/s:

"For initiating a contempt proceeding against the contemnor opposite parties for their willful and deliberate disobedience and violation of the order dated 30.10.2017 passed in L.P.A. No.968 of 2015 passed by Hon'ble Chief

Patna High Court MJC No.1203 of 2018(5) dt.12-12-2019 2/2 Justice and Justice Anil Kumar Upadhyay, arising out of C.W.J.C. No.17481 of 2014 and after initiation of such contempt proceeding to convict and punish them suitably." In view of the the show cause filed by the respondent No.7, the application has become infructuous. As such, the application is disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U