← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1164/2018disposed

Arun v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-07-19Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1164 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14860 of 2004 ====================================================== Arun, Son of Late Kameshwar Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Bagmali, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali, at present 104, Chandra Lok Apartment, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Mr. M. Ramachandrudu Tudu, Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mrs. Rachana Patil, District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4.

Mrs. Vimala Kumari, Regional Deputy Director, North Bihar, at Muzaffarpur.

5.

Mrs. Sangeeta Sinha, District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at Hajipur.

6.

The Block Extension Education Officer, Raghopur-cum-Secretary, Adhoc Managing Committee, Town Middl ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Prabhu Nath Pathak, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Vinay Prasad Singh, A.C. to G.A. XII. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application with a liberty to approach before the Appellate Authority to dispose of his application at the earliest.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. If any such petition/application is made before the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority shall consider the

Patna High Court MJC No.1164 of 2018(5) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 same and pass an appropriate order at the earliest keeping in mind that the matter has been pending for a long time. It has further been pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the appeal before the Appellate Authority and during the pendency of the present contempt application, the petitioner has died. If so advised, appropriate substitution petition may be filed before the Appellate Authority.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present contempt application stands disposed of. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T