Baleshwar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37890 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2021 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== BALESHWAR MANJHI S/O BHUNA MANJHI Resident of VillageRamgarh Mushahari, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 353, 354, 427 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that on information, petitioner was apprehended with liquor but the villagers, hundred in numbers, started creating ruckus, further, petitioner along with his family members assaulted the police party and the petitioner fled and accused also snatched mobile of S.I. Pushpa.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioner was never apprehended at the place of occurrence nor he was present at the place of occurrence, it is next submitted that the police had come

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37890 of 2022(2) dt.02-12-2022 2/2 in the village and had entered the house of the petitioner in his absence and on account of which the villagers gathered as the police were misbehaving with the family members, it is next submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner was apprehended with liquor but then no liquor was seized nor it is the allegation in the FIR that petitioner along with the liquor fled.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 334 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T