Ajay Ram @ Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38020 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2021 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== AJAY RAM @ AJAY KUMAR S/O JULUM RAM Resident of VillageDarkha, P.S.- Lachhuar, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 323, 325, 307, 353, 332, 333, 427 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3⁄4 of the Damage to Property Act.

Petitioner along with other co-accused including 100150 persons is said to have blocked road and damaged the Government property.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38020 of 2022(2) dt.29-09-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that one of the co-accused had filed an anticipatory bail application which was withdrawn with a liberty to file a regular bail application in the learned court below. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that another co-accused had not been granted anticipatory bail, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Lachchuar P.S. Case No. 03 of 2021. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T