Patna High CourtMJC/3418/2014disposed

Krishna Prasad Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-09-16Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3418 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3701 of 2013 ====================================================== Krishna Prasad Singh, son of late Darshan Singh, resident of Mohalla Chandmari Road, Azad Path NO. 4 P.O. Kankarbagh Colony, Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India.

1A. Mr. A.N. Rai, Chairman, cum Managing Director, BSNL Bharat Sanchar Bhavan, harish Chandra Mathur Lane, Janpath, New Delhi. 2.Mr. Shiv Shankar Choudhary, Principal General Manager, Telecom District, Telephone Bhavan, Rajendra Prasad Singh-Block, Patna.

3. Mr. Rajendra Choudhary, A.G.M. (Legal) BSNL, Bihar circle, Patna.

4. Mr. Satish Chandra Jha, Joint/Deputy controller of Communication Acconts, 2nd Floor, CTO, Annexe Building, Patna.

5. Mr. T.B. Gayak, Senior Communication Accounts Officer, O/0 Controller of Communication Accounts, 2nd Floor, CTO, Annexe Building, Patna.

6. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Senior Accounts Officer (TA) O/0 Principal General Manager, Telecom District Telephone Bhavan, R Block, Patna.

7. Mr. Ram Dash, Accounts Officer, DOT Cell, Bihar, O/o Controller of Communication Accounts, 2nd Floor, CTO Annexe Building, Patna.

8. Mr. Jitendra Singh, Chief Post Master, GPO, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinay Raj For the Respondent/s : Mr. Renuka Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-09-2015 Supplementary show cause is filed on behalf of opposite party no. 3.

Heard the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the opposite party no. 3 that grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed to which learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that calculation regarding 5th Pay Revision has not been done properly

Patna High Court MJC No.3418 of 2014 (9) dt.16-09-2015 2/2 for which a representation has already been filed before the competent authority.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this contempt petition stands disposed of with direction to concerned authority to pass appropriate order on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with the rules.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U