Santosh Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34351 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== SANTOSH KUMAR SAH Son of Parmanand Sah Resident of VillageBaradbatta, Police Station- Palasi, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Puja Devi Daughter of Dule Lal Sharma Wife of Santosh Kumar Sah, resident of Village- Parrabari, Police Station- Palasi, District- Araria. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in which cognizance has been taken registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34351 of 2020(2) dt.17-03-2021 2/2 the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Araria in connection with Complaint Case No. 122C of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T