Babulal Rajvanshi @Babulal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40290 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2022 Thana- GOVINDPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== Babulal Rajvanshi @Babulal Kumar S/O Munna Rajvanshi R/O VILLAGE...Bali Mahri,Police Station...Satgawan, Distt-Koderma(Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 302, 201, 34 of the IPC. 3.

As per the prosecution case, informant received an information that her son has been killed and his dead body is thrown in a paddy field.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown persons. During the course of investigation one person was apprehended and he disclosed that the petitioner is also involved in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40290 of 2024(2) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 the present case. He further submitted that similarly situated coaccused persons have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Benches of this Court (Annexure-P/3 and Annexure-P/4 series). There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 03.04.2024. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the period of custody, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.341 of 2022.

7.

However, the petitioner shall remain physically present in the court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T