Patna High CourtMJC/1186/2018dismissed

Gyanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Namely, Sri Atul Prasad, Social Welfare Department, Govern

2018-09-26Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1186 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4460 of 2014 ====================================================== Gyanti Devi, Wife of Subodh Pandit, Resident of Village and P.O. Madhupur, P.S. Alipur, District Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary namely, Sri Atul Prasad, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Deputy Director, Welfare, Magadh Division, Gaya

3. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector namely Abhishek Kumar, Gaya

4. The District Programme Officer namely Sri Kanhaiya Yadav, Gaya

5. The C.D.P.O. namely Sweta Kumari, Tikari Block, District Gaya ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhoy Kumar Kashyap For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha - Ga 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has filed this petition for initiation of a contempt proceeding for violation of the order dated 17.07.2017, passed in CWJC No.4460 of 2014 by which the opposite parties were directed to consider the case of the petitioner for his appointment and dispose of the representation within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by Annexure-D, the Selection Committee made selection and representation of the petitioner has already been disposed of.

Patna High Court MJC No.1186 of 2018(4) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 In this view of the fact, I find that no case is made out for initiation of contempt against the opposite parties as the order has already been complied with. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner that if he is aggrieved by the order as contained in Annexure-D, the petitioner may file appeal before the appropriate authority against the order of Selection Committee.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) S.KUMAR/- U