← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2864/2018disposed

Vijay Kant Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-04-27Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2864 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3550 of 2011 ====================================================== Vijay Kant Jha Son of Late Pheku Jha, Resident of Village- Katsari Barit, P.O. Pardeshiya, P.S. and District- Sheohar.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sri Amrit Lal Meena, the Commissioner- Secretary-cum Special Officer Traffic Road Construction Dep 3.

Sri Lakshmi Narayan Das, the Deputy Secretary Road Construction Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Lakshami Narayan Das, the Engineer in Chief Road Construction Department National Highways Biha 5.

Sri Krishna Chandra Thakur, the Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department National Highways, Bih 6.

Sri Ranjit Kumar Mishra the Super tending Engineer National Highways Circle, Road Construction Depa 7.

Sri Anuradha Chandra, the Executive Engineer National Highways Division2, Road Construction Depart ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amit Prakash GA 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Amit Prakash, learned G.A.-13 for the State.

A 5th supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the State showing the payment which were admittedly due to petitioner have already been made. It is submitted on behalf of the State that the judgment/order of this Court of which contempt has been alleged stands fully complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute

Patna High Court MJC No.2864 of 2018(9) dt.27-04-2022 2/2 that so far as the order of this Court is concerned, that stands complied with but his grievance is that the salary for the last five months period has still not been paid.

If it is so, the petitioner may represent this before the competent authority who shall examine the same and if there is any admissible payment then the same shall also be paid to the petitioner within a reasonable time.

This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.