Patna High CourtCWJC/13126/2017dismissed

Subodh Kumar v. The High Court Of Judicature At Patna And ANR

2018-01-04Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13126 of 2017 =========================================================== Subodh Kumar S/o Late Umesh Prasad R/o- Old Jakkanpur Janta Road Police Station Gardanibag Near Kusum Niwas District- Patna, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The High Court of Judicature At Patna (Administrative Side) (through its Registrar General), Bihar, Patna.

2. The Government of Bihar (through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department) Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Uday Narayan Singh, Adv.

Mr. Harendra Prasad, Adv.

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, Adv.

Mr. Sunil Prasad, Adv.

Mr. Pancham Lal Jaiswal, Adv.

Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, Adv.

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Adv.

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Jaiswal, Adv.

Mr. Phulen Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Adv.

Mr. Ram Varan Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Lalit Kishor - A.G. For the High Court : Mr. Piyush Lal, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 04-01-2018 I.A. No. 21 of 2018 is dismissed. The petitioner has a right to agitate the issue independent of the cause raised in the present writ application.

Heard counsel for the petitioner, learned Advocate General representing the State and the counsel representing the High Court.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13126 of 2017 dt.04-01-2018 2/2 The writ application is dismissed for the simple reason that an identical question raised in the present set of writ application has already been answered in C.W.J.C. No. 14609 of 2016 decided on 03.07.2017, a copy of which is Annexure-A to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 1. The reason assigned therein covers the case squarely.

Submission of the counsel for the petitioner that the Rule has to be read retrospectively has also been considered in the order dated 03.07.2017 and answered.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/Devendra AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date06.01.2018 Transmission Date NA