Md. Zameer v. The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.361 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Zameer, Son of Kamaluddin Ansari, Resident of Near Dwar Devi Chock, P.S.- Bettiah Town, District- Bettiah, Bihar. 2.

Noor Ambary Khatoon, Daughter of Iusuf Ansari, Resident of Kherdeur Mahna, P.S.- Chanpaia, District- West Champaran, Bihar. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, through its Chairman, Apex Tower, Harun Nagar, Sector- 02, Phulwari Sharif, Patna- 801505. 2.

The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board through its Secretary, Apex Tower, Harun Nagar, Sector- 02, Phulwari Sharif, Patna- 801505. 3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar. 4.

The District Education Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 5.

The District Program Officer, Establishment, West Champaran, Bettiah. 6.

The Secretary, Managing Committee, Madarsa Islamiya Kherdeur, Mahna, P.O. and P.S.- Chanpatiya, District- West Champaran, (Madarsa No. 889). ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, AC to GP-20 For the Board :

Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to avail the statutory remedy available to the petitioners under Section 28 of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board Act.

Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, learned counsel for the Bihar State Madrasa Education Board and Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, learned AC to GP-20 for the State are present. Permission is granted.

Patna High Court CWJC No.361 of 2021(3) dt.10-08-2023 2/2 This application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

In case, any question of limitation arises for consideration, the same will be considered keeping in view that the petitioners were pursuing their remedy before this Court under some legal advice and bonafide beliefs. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) lekhi/- U