← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36362/2025bail rejected

Baifu Kumar Bind @ Befu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-18Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36362 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Baifu Kumar Bind @ Befu Kumar S/o Buchu Bind Village- Baheriya, PSChand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Keshar Kumari D/o Late Prashnat Kumar Bond Village- Baheriya, PSChand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 36 of 2025 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 376-D and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 & 6 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per FIR, this petitioner along with other coaccused persons committed rape upon sister of informant and threatened not to reveal the ordeal to anyone.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to old enmity and land dispute. There

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36362 of 2025(2) dt.18-07-2025 2/2 is no medical examination report in support of the allegation of physical assault. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and he is in custody since 11.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the bail application of the petitioner and submits that petitioner along with other co-accused has committed rape upon the victim girl. Hence, he does not deserve bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as nature of allegation against the petitioner, the prayer for grant of regular bail is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) ajay/- U T