Bam Singh @ Vishal Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38528 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2025 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== Bam Singh @ Vishal Singh S/o Munnu Singh @ Mannu Singh Resident of Vill. - Merhi, P.S. - M.H. Nagar, Dist. - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Daraundha P.S. Case No. 318 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other named accused persons had approached the informant and started assaulting him through various means. It is further alleged that the petitioner snatched away something and gave threatening of dire consequences.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against all and, in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38528 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 fact, there is an allegation against the petitioner of snatching something, but it is no where alleged as to what had been snatched and a vague allegation of threatening has also been alleged. It has further been submitted that the informant and the other named accused persons are own agnates and the petitioner is not even the resident of the said village and he has falsely been implicated without there being any specific allegation. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has got clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Siwan in connection with Daraundha P.S. Case No. 318 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner and the other shall be a local resident:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38528 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 (ii) the petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court and shall cooperate in the investigation;
(iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;
(iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the same on in the name of verification.
7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) krishna/- U T