← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16083/2018disposed

Fudo Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-09-11Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16083 of 2018 ====================================================== Fudo Devi Wife of Umesh Mandal, Resident of Village-Bahadurpur, P.S.- Gogari, District-Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Secretary, State Vidhik Seva Pradhikar, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Secretary, District Vidhik Seva Pradhikar, Khagaria. 4.

The Distirct Magistrate cum Member Criminal Injury Compensation Board, Khagaria.

5.

The Chief Medical Officer Cum Member Injury Compensation Board, Khagaria.

6.

The Superintendent of Police, Cum Member Criminal Injury Compensation Board, Khagaria.

7.

The Block Development Officer, Gogari 8.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gogari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha -Ga7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 11-09-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of any appropriate writ or writs, rule or direction, especially in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioner under the scheme of Bihar Pirit Pratikar Scheme, 2014 for rehabilitation."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.16083 of 2018(3) dt.11-09-2024 2/2 seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge the order dated 19.07.2017, passed by the District Legal Services Authority, Khagaria, by filing appropriate appeal. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. It is needless to state that in case appropriate appeal is filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered on merits by the appellate authority, without it being impeded by the issue of limitation.

4. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U