← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35231/2020allowed

Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35231 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2020 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Raushan Kumar, Male, aged about 19 years, Son of Late Uday Rai 2.

Umesh Rai, Gender - Male, aged about 36 years, Son of Prem Rai, both are resident of Village - Sabalpur New Tola, P.S.- Sonepur in the district of Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Dilip Kumar, No.1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 214 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant, brother of the deceased, alleged that at about 4.00 in the evening, petitioner no.1 took his brother from his house. The informant saw that Raju Rai, accused no.1, petitioner no.2, Umesh Rai and Santosh Rai, accused no.2 were also following them. They disclosed that the brother of the informant should be allowed to go to celebrate Holi festival. At about 7.00 in the evening, the informant came to know that t he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35231 of 2020(4) dt.22-02-2021 2/2 dead bodyof his brother was lying near the field of Manoj Rai. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.01.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No.32338 of 2020. He further submits that the petitioner is in jail custody since 16.06.2020 and there is no specific allegation against these petitioners. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail petition. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 214 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T