Patna High CourtCWJC/12782/2017disposed

Pragya Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-23Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12782 of 2017 ====================================================== Pragya Devi Wife of Rahul Dubey, Resident of Village-Mangerwaliya, Ward No.06, Police Station-Rajpur, District-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department, of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department, of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, (I.C.D.S.), Bihar, Patna.

4. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

5. The Disttrict Magistrate, Rohtas.

6. The District Programme Officer, Rohtas.

7. The Child Development Project Officer(C.D.P.O.), Rajpur, DistrictRohtas.

8. The Mukhiya, Mangralia Panchayat.

9. The Selection Committee, Anganwari Sevika/ Sahaika, Ward No.6 through its Secretary at Mangralia P.S.-Baghaila, District-Rohtas

10. Jyoti Dubey Wife of Ravindra Kumar Dubey Wife of Ravindra Kumar Dubey, Resident of Village-Mangerwaliya, P.O.Sarpara, P.S.-Rajpur, District-Rohtas.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kaushal Kr Jha,AAG-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-04-2018 After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file an appeal against the order dated 03.03.2017 passed by the District Programme Officer. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of and in case the petitioner files an appeal within a period of four weeks from today before the learned Collector,

Patna High Court CWJC No.12782 of 2017 (2) dt.23-04-2018 2/2 Rohtas at Sasaram, the learned Collector shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order considering the merits of the case within a period of eight weeks thereafter. It is made clear that the learned Collector shall not take into account the delay caused in filing the appeal. The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U