← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42339/2024dismissed

Sachin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-02Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42339 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-679 Year-2022 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Sachin Kumar Son of Jawahar Rai @ Butai Rai Resident of Village - Amnabad, P.S.- Bihta, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Usha Kumari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 679 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable u/s 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3.

As per the prosecution story, from the house of the petitioner, one country made pistol and four live cartridges were recovered.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The said arms were recovered from the house of the petitioner not in a possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent and is in custody since 03.04.2024.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42339 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 2/2 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and considering the nature of offence and also considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of regular bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

8. This application is accordingly dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Guddu/- U