Bipin Paswan @ Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37337 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Bipin Paswan @ Bipin Kumar S/O Shatrudhan Paswan R/O VillageDubarbanra, Kishanpur, Post and Police Station- Warisnagar, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 109,324(4),308(5),134,303(2),352,351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner assaulted the informant and his son, causing injuries to them. It is further alleged that they snatched cash amounting to Rs.42,000/- and a gold chain worth Rs.1,20,000/- from the informant's son.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37337 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to a land dispute pending between the parties. It is further submitted that no such occurrence ever took place. Learned counsel further submitted that the allegation of snatching cash amounting to Rs.42,000/- and a gold chain worth Rs.1,20,000/- from the informant's son does not satisfy the essential ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 303 of the BNS. Petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37337 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 satisfaction of learned JMSC, Samastipur / Concerned Court in connection with Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T